J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2025; 86(04): 438-451
DOI: 10.1055/a-2364-3189
Original Article

Pilot Program in Surgical Anatomy Education for Complex Cranial and Skull Base Procedures: Curriculum Overview and Initial 2-Year Experience at Mayo Clinic

Juliana C. Capp
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
4   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
,
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Avital Perry
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
,
Carlos D. Pinheiro-Neto
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
David J. Daniels
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Michael J. Link
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Luciano C.P.C. Leonel*
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
6   Department of Clinical Anatomy, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Maria Peris-Celda*
1   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background Cadaveric dissection remains a preferred and irreplaceable learning modality among neurosurgery residents. We aimed to develop and describe a tiered, quantifiable, and practical curriculum for cranial neurosurgical anatomy education. We report the structure and evaluation of our 2-year pilot study to serve as a suggested guide for other neurosurgery programs.

Methods Our Complex Cranial Dissection Program is tailored to the needs of junior-level neurosurgery residents based on their postgraduation years 1 to 4. Dissections are performed in a sequential manner, each of which emphasize a particular set of manual skills and neuroanatomical knowledge. Dissections are scored on a scale of 10 points. The grading was based on specific landmarks and anatomical structures, which need to be exposed, explored, and preserved.

Results Out of 16 residents, 14 individuals (87.5%) attended the dissections in the first iteration of the program and 16 individuals (100%) attended the dissections in the second iteration. A total of 17 dissections were performed across all years. In survey feedback about the program, 100% (Year 1) and 94% (Year 2) of residents considered the assigned dissections to be appropriate for their respective training levels. Further, 100% (Year 1) and 94% (Year 2) of residents endorsed that the dissections were important and helpful for their practice prior to similar operating room experiences.

Conclusion The development and implementation of structured dissection programs within residency training, along with dedicated staff, and objective feedback serve a crucial role in neurosurgical education to further develop and enhance surgical skills in the operative setting.

Previous Presentation

Part of this research has been presented as Poster at the 31st North American Skull Base Society, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.


* These authors are senior co-authors.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 23 May 2024

Accepted: 03 July 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
11 July 2024

Article published online:
05 August 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany